A CHAPTER IN THE HISTORY
OF THE KELLY GANG
The case of James Wallace, State school teacher,
whose dismissal from the public service was recently announced,
forms a curious and not unintuitive chapter in the history of
Ned Kelly, the outlaw, and his companions in crime.
The
circumstances connected with his alleged sympathy, if not
complicity, with the gang are surrounded with uncertainty and
mystery, the unraveling of which has totally baffled all the
exertions of the police. Wallace was a State school teacher in the
North-eastern District when Sergeant Kennedy and his comrades were
murdered near Mansfield. He conducted two half-time schools, one
at Hurdle Creek and the other at Bobinawarrah, about ten miles
distant from each other. The former was his headquarters, and
there he also acted as postmaster.
Having been a schoolmate of Joe
Byrne, a strong friendship had grown up between him and the
outlaw, and from his position and long residence in the district
he was intimately acquainted with the peculiarities of the
country, the haunts of the gangs, their relatives and
sympathisers. When therefore he applied to Captain Standish, early
in 1879, to be employed as a secret agent, the Chief Commissioner,
although inundated with similar offers, felt personally disposed
to avail himself of his services, and that he did not do so was
simply owing to Wallace's apparent untrustworthiness.
The Chief
Commissioner was led to this conclusion owing to a very peculiar
circumstance. Negotiations had been secretly opened with Captain
Standish by a well known spy with a view to inducing Joe Byrne to
betray his mates. Acting upon an understanding with this agent,
the Chief Commissioner, accompanied only be an orderly, left
Benalla one night without allowing his destination or departure to
be known. He rode through the bush straight towards Hurdle Creek,
but he failed to meet his informant. About eight o'clock in the
morning he found himself near the schoolhouse. Wallace observed
him and having previously been in communication with the Chief
Commissioner in relation to the Kellys he at once invited him to
breakfast.
In the course of the conversation that ensued the
schoolmaster stated that he had long been on terms of friendship
with Byrne and Aaron Sherritt, but neither of them had been near
his place since the murders. The Chief Commissioner rode back to
Benalla, where he found Aaron Sherritt awaiting his return. In the
interview which followed Sherritt stated that he had been staying
some time at Wallace's house, and had only left it the day
previously.
This incident led the Chief Commissioner to think that
Mr. Wallace was not very reliable. The facts connected with the
bootless errand of the Chief Commissioner are variously recounted,
one version being that Captain Standish was led to expect that Joe
Byrne would meet him, but that he refused to do so at the last
moment. Further, that at the very time he was partaking of
breakfast the outlaw was in the room adjoining. This, however, was
stoutly denied by Wallace.
Some six months later, Mr. Nicolson,
who had succeeded to the command of the pursuit, visited Wallace,
and, thinking that his services might be useful, undertook to
employ him as a secret agent. Wallace shaped splendidly at the
start. He was a very prolific correspondent, and if his other
exertions bore any proportion to his epistolary zeal the Kellys
must have soon been run to earth. He furnished elaborate accounts
respecting his adventures in search of the outlaws' lair, that
read like extracts from the romance of Robin Hood and his Merrie
Men.
He described with great circumstantiality the physical
peculiarities of the ranges he had passed over, the creeks and
ravines he had crossed, the individuals he had met and conversed
with, and drew a lively picture of the outlaws holding a sort of
rifle tourney in the depths of the forest and otherwise spending
the leisure and tranquil hours in their mountain home. After a
time a game of cross-purposes arose between Wallace and Detective
Ward. While they outwardly expressed the utmost friendship they
were secretly writing to Mr. Nicolson denouncing each other in
emphatic terms.
Wallace charged Ward with revealing police secrets
to the sympathisers, and with being guilty of conduct which, on
moral grounds, was highly reprehensible. Ward, on the other hand,
repeatedly furnished reports directly implying that Wallace was in
secret league with the outlaws, selling their gold, changing their
notes and supplying them with provisions and clothing. The
detective had not been informed of the fact that Wallace was
employed by the police, and he naturally kept a watchful and
perhaps a jaundiced eye upon that gentleman's movements.
Wallace
was consistent in one particular — namely, that notwithstanding
the voluminous nature of his correspondence he avoided
communicating anything of importance to the police. That he could
have otherwise acted there seems little doubt, inasmuch as upon
his own admission when under examination he had met Joe Byrne on
one occasion and Ned Kelly on another, but failed to inform Mr. Nicolson of the fact until the matter was mentioned to him some
weeks afterwards.
The reasons he assigned for this singular
reticence were the distance he was from Benalla, the utter
uselessness, as he considered, of giving the information, and the
probability of Detective Ward communicating the intelligence to
some of the sympathisers, and thus directly compromising him. At
length Mr. Nicolson began to think Wallace's letters,
unaccompanied by a more satisfactory outcome of his supposed
efforts, somewhat monotonous.
He expostulated with Wallace, and
threatened to dispense with his services. He had received various
sums of money, and in his letters frequently applied for payment
of certain amounts. On one occasion he had hinted that owing to
the time he devoted to the Kelly business he was likely to lose
£10 by way of results from his schools, but it was subsequently
proved that he had a fixed salary, and did not depend upon results
for any portion of his remuneration.
When the
Assistant-Commissioner wrote on the subject of paying him for his
services, Wallace repudiated the insinuation that he had even been
a paid agent. He only required and demanded actual expenses
incurred in prosecuting his inquiries. Finding apparently that
nothing was likely to be gained from a further retention of his
services, Wallace ceased to be employed by Mr. Nicolson some time
prior to the destruction of the gang. There seems good ground for
believing that Wallace was cognisant of the haunts and doings of
the gang to a much greater extent than he has ever acknowledged.
In one of his letters the following significant passage occurs:—
"When time shall have dissolved the obligation of secrecy I shall
be able perhaps to state more fully," &c, &c. Again, in his late
letters he takes credit for his efforts in assisting to save life;
and he darkly hints at being, in some way not stated, instrumental
in bringing about the capture and destruction of the outlaws. His
testimony and correspondence, however, are characterised by great
caution, and are more specious than satisfactory or convincing. He
writes a readable letter, and has a literacy and somewhat
cultivated style; but from a police point of view their principal
feature indicated more than ordinary powers of imagination.
Wallace's proceedings became known to the officers of the
Education department some months prior to the destruction of the
gang. In consequence of certain representations made to the
department arrangements were privately made to remove him. This
was determined upon about a week before the affray at Glenrowan.
Without any previous notification his successor was sent up to
Hurdle Creek, bringing with him his authority to take immediate
charge of the school, and instructions to Wallace to at once
proceed to Yea to take over the local school. Owing, however, to
Wallace's connection with the Post Office department he could not
leave as soon as directed. Some days are said to have elapsed
before he proceeded to his destination.
It would be most unjust, in the absence of direct proof, to
maintain that Wallace personally knew anything of, or had any
complicity in, the doings of the gang immediately prior to
Glenrowan, or, indeed, at any period during which he was acting
for the police. The most that can be urged is suspicion.
Immediately upon his suspension his case was entrusted to one of
the ablest and most experienced officers in the Government service
for investigation, and he, together with a prominent official in
the Education department, went into the matter most carefully, and
though there were many things inexplicable, and surrounded with
suspicion, nothing was discovered that when duly weighed and
regarded from a legal point of view could be construed into an
absolute charge against Wallace of any participation in the
proceedings of the gang.
A remarkable discovery was, however, made by the police about six
months subsequent to the extermination of the outlaws. While
scouring the country in the vicinity of Hurdle Creek a solitary
hut was found in the bush. It presented the appearance of having
some time previously been in permanent occupation. It was fitted
up with four banks, and the place was strewn with empty tins, such
as those used for preserved fish and meat, an immense quantity of
bottles, and similar indications of good living. Now, it has
always been a mystery where the gang concealed themselves for the
six or eight months that preceded their final exploit. It has been
stated that they were located at Wilson's paddock, near Greta,
also in a paddock near Sebastopol, where they are said to have
been frequently seen by the owner of the land.
They have also been
described as travelling constantly from one portion of the
district to another. But there is no evidence to support those
statements. It must be obvious that, in order to ensure an
uninterrupted supply of provisions and secure themselves against
the inclemency of the weather, they must have had a fixed abode of
some sort — one of easy access, and removed from the general
surveillance or suspicion of the police authorities. The hut found
near Hurdle Creek would have answered every purpose. From the
inquiries made in the neighborhood sufficient information was
gleaned to lead the authorities to conclude that the outlaws for a
time lay concealed in this hut.
The police at the time were averse
to reopening the Kelly business, and no action was taken in
relation to the discovery for some months. Then, however, the
matter was taken up and strict search instituted. The officials
who had undertaken to investigate the matter despatched two
detectives to the scene, but their mission proved fruitless. Their
visit had been apparently forestalled. On reaching the spot they
found the hut burned to the ground, and the tins, bottles and
similar debris totally destroyed so as to prevent a
possibility of identification. The destruction had been caused,
the detectives thought, by a bush fire; but an examination of the
place showed that the fire had commenced a little below the hut on
the rise, and the flames having done their work soon died out
after passing over the spot where the hut stood. Regret was
expressed by several upon becoming acquainted with the fact that
the police in the first instance had not taken the precaution to
preserve the empty tins and bottles seen in and around the hut
inasmuch as the identity of the purchasers might thereby have been
traced.
Other circumstances of a suspicious nature were discovered that
strengthened the supposition that Wallace was cognisant of the
whereabouts of the outlaws, but there was only one witness who
could give decisive evidence upon the point. That witness, when
sought, had disappeared, from no other motive seemingly than to
defeat further inquiry. After a close scrutiny of all the facts
connected with Wallace's case, the most that can be said is that
his conduct was inexplicably mysterious and unsatisfactory. The
evidence against him is purely circumstantial. At the same time it
must be remembered that he had the power in his hands to remove
any doubt as to his bona fides, and if he, as he states,
has allowed certain obligations to seal his lips he cannot blame
the department for putting the very worst construction upon his
silence. If guilty, he has been but lightly punished; if innocent,
he has only his own reticence to thank for his dismissal. Of this
there cannot be a reasonable doubt; that under the circumstances
the Government was left no other alternative than to dispense with
his services as a State school teacher, in accordance with the
recommendation of the Royal Commission on Police.
|